湿法炼锌硫化氢沉铜砷工艺探索
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

云锡文山锌铟冶炼有限公司, 云南 文山 663700

作者简介:

潘辉(1989—),男,云南昆明人,本科,工程师,主要从事湿法炼锌方面的技术工作。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TF813;TF803.2+5

基金项目:


Exploration on the process of copper-arsenic precipitation with hydrogen sulfide in zinc hydrometallurgy
Author:
Affiliation:

Wenshan Zinc-Indium Metallurgy Co.Ltd.,Yunnan Tin Group, Wenshan 663700 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    湿法炼锌过程中还原后液除铜砷工艺在国内外研究较少,目前常用的是铁粉沉铜,该工序是赤铁矿工艺中辅料用量最大、成本最高的除杂工序,而且还存在铁粉耗量大、铜砷沉降不彻底、后液铜砷含量不达标等问题。本文以云南某冶炼厂的还原后液为原料进行了硫化氢沉铜砷试验探索,考察了硫化氢用量、反应时间、温度等多个工艺参数对铜砷去除效率的影响,结果表明:仅有硫化氢加入量和铜渣晶种返回量对铜砷去除效率影响较大,其余因素影响均较小;硫化氢通入量需达到理论用量的1.2倍时,铜、砷才开始有效沉降,达到理论用量的1.4倍时,铜、砷去除率分别为99.95%、98.45%,可满足酸性溶液中铜砷含量的要求;返回铜渣晶种可提高铜、砷的去除率,硫化氢过量系数等于1.2倍时,加入5g/L铜渣晶种,反应时间30min,铜去除率可达99.87%、砷去除率可达95.12%。该探索试验表明采用硫化氢沉降还原后液中铜砷的工艺是可行的,且其铜砷去除效率远远高于铁粉沉铜工艺,具有推广应用价值。

    Abstract:

    Few researches have been made at home and abroad on the process of Cu & As removal from the post reduction solution in zinc hydrometallurgy. The commonly used process at present is Cu precipitation with Fe powder. However, this process is an impurity removal process with the largest consumption of hematite as auxiliary material and the highest cost, moreover, it has such disadvantages as large consumption of Fe powder, incomplete Cu & As precipitation and the Cu & As content in the post-precipitation solution being off standard, etc. In this paper, exploratory tests have been carried out on the process of Cu & As precipitation with hydrogen sulfide by using the post-reduction solution from a smelter in Yunnan Province as feed material, to study the influence of process parameters including hydrogen sulfide dosage, reaction time and temperature, etc. on Cu & As precipitation efficiency. The test results show that only the hydrogen sulfide dosage and the return amount of Cu residue crystal seed have relatively large influence on the Cu & As precipitation efficiency; the hydrogen sulfide dosage needs to be 1.2 times of the theoretical value to start the effective precipitation of Cu & As, and when it’s 1.4 times of the theoretical value, the precipitation efficiency of Cu and As is 99.95% and 98.45% respectively, which can meet the requirement of the acidic solution on Cu and As content; the return of Cu residue crystal seed can improve the Cu & As precipitation efficiency, when the excess coefficient of hydrogen sulfide is 1.2, Cu residue crystal seed of 5g/L is added into the solution, after reaction for 30min, the precipitation efficiency of Cu and As can reach 99.87% and 95.12% respectively. The exploratory tests indicate that the process using hydrogen sulfide to precipitate Cu & As in the post-reduction solution is feasible, its Cu & As precipitation efficiency is much higher than that of the Fe powder Cu precipitation process, thus, it deserves promoted application.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

潘辉,陶家荣,陆开臣,等.湿法炼锌硫化氢沉铜砷工艺探索[J]. 中国有色冶金, 2022, 51(1):30-33.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-16
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-12-24
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码