火试金法测定铜冶炼物料中银补正系数研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

紫金铜业有限公司, 福建 龙岩 364204

作者简介:

罗联诗(1986—),男,福建大田人,本科,中级工程师,主要从事有色金属检测及管理工作。E-mail:469012140@qq.com。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TF811;TF801+.3

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划“国家质量基础的共性技术研究与应用”(2019YFF0217100)


Study on determination of silver correction coefficient of copper smelting materials by fire assay
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    火试金法是分析化学中的一种经典的分析方法,对于熔炼和灰吹过程中产生的银损失,标准分析方法中采用二次试金或三次试金进行补正,虽然校正结果很好,但存在分析流程长、操作成本高、人为操作误差增加等问题。本文通过对铜冶炼中铜精矿、金精矿、粗铜、铜阳极泥等物料进行分类实验,统计分析了大量的实验数据,分别用一次试金法和二次试金法计算各物料的银补正系数,得到以下结果:银含量小于200g/t时,补正系数为1.03;银含量在200~500g/t范围,补正系数为1.025;银含量在500~1000g/t范围,补正系数为1.02;银含量大于1000g/t时,补正系数为1.01。通过对照实验和显著性检验,证明本方法测定结果准确、可靠。相对于传统的火试金法,本方法解决了二次试金或三次试金带来的耗时、误差增大等问题,达到了节能、降耗、省时的效果。

    Abstract:

    The fire assay is a classic analysis method in analytical chemistry. For the silver loss during the smelting and ash blowing process, the standard analysis method uses the second test or the third test to make corrections. Although the calibration results are very good, there are problems such as long analysis process, high operation cost, and increase of human operation error. In this paper, through the classification experiment of copper concentrate, gold concentrate, blister copper, copper anode slime and other materials in copper smelting, a large number of experimental data are statistically analyzed, and the primary and secondary testing methods are used to calculate the silver correction coefficient of each material, and get the following results. When the silver content is less than 200g/t, the correction coefficient is 1.03; when the silver content is in the range of 200~500g/t, the correction coefficient is 1.025; when the silver content is in the range of 500~1000g/t, the correction coefficient is 1.02; when the silver content is greater than 1000g/t, the correction coefficient is 1.01. The control experiment and the significance test prove that the result of this method is accurate and reliable. Compared with the traditional fire assay method, this method solves the problems of time-consuming and errors caused by the second test or third test, and achieves the effects of energy saving, consumption reduction and time saving.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

罗联诗,刘芳美,赖秋祥,吕火秀,廖彬玲.火试金法测定铜冶炼物料中银补正系数研究[J].中国有色冶金,2021,50(1):62-69

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-26
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-12-24
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码