不同敷设方式的服役XLPE电缆绝缘结构及性能劣化规律研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

中国铁路西安局集团有限公司 西安高铁基础设施段, 陕西 西安 710000

作者简介:

张瑞祥(1998—),男,陕西咸阳人,助理工程师,主要研究方向为高电压与绝缘。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TM215.1

基金项目:


Study on the degradation law of insulation structure and performance of XLPE cables in service with different laying methods
Author:
Affiliation:

China Railway Xian Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Xian High speed Rail Infrastructure Section, Xian 710000 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    本文以110kV XLPE电力电缆为研究对象,比较了直埋、排管、电缆沟敷设方式下电缆服役13年的情况。为了对XLPE绝缘材料的劣化规律进行表征,本文采用了傅里叶红外光谱(FTIR)、差式扫描量热(DSC)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、热重分析(TG)、宽频介电谱和工频击穿试验等多种研究手段。结果表明:服役13年的XLPE电缆绝缘相比未服役电缆在微观结构和宏观性能上均出现明显劣化,具体表现为XLPE分子链发生断裂,C[FY=,1]O、C[FY=,1]C、—OH等极性基团增多,直埋、排管敷设时熔融温度、结晶度较低,电缆沟道敷设时熔融温度、结晶度较高,球晶形态均遭到破坏;3种不同敷设方式下的XLPE电力电缆介电常数及介电损耗均上升,工频击穿场强下降。其中,排管敷设的电缆绝缘在结构和性能上具有更快的劣化速率,直埋敷设次之,电缆沟道敷设劣化速率最慢。产生上述差异的原因在于沟道敷设电缆的散热条件最好,在施加电流相同的情况下,电缆运行温度最低,排管敷设电缆散热条件最差,电缆运行温度最高。

    Abstract:

    In this paper, the 110kV XLPE power cable is taken as the research object, and the service of the cable for 13 years under different laying methods is compared. In order to characterize the deterioration of XLPE insulating materials, this paper used a variety of research methods, such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TG), broadband dielectric spectroscopy and power frequency breakdown test. The results show that the microstructure and macroscopic properties of XLPE cable insulation in service for 13 years are significantly degraded compared with those in non-service cables, as follows: XLPE molecular chains are broken, polar groups such as C[FY=,1]O, C[FY=,1]C and —OH are increased, the melting temperature and crystallinity are lower in direct burial and drain laying, and the melting temperature and crystallinity are higher in cable trench laying. The dielectric constant and dielectric loss have increased, and the frequency breakdown field strength has decreased. Among them, the structure and performance of the cable insulation laid in the row pipe has a faster rate of deterioration, the direct burial laying is the second, and the cable trench laying has the slowest rate of deterioration. The reason for this difference is that the trench laid cable has the best heat dissipation conditions and the lowest cable operating temperature with the same applied current, while the duct laid cable has the worst heat dissipation conditions and the highest cable operating temperature.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张瑞祥,马耿,权胜利.不同敷设方式的服役XLPE电缆绝缘结构及性能劣化规律研究[J].有色设备,2024,38(4):55-64.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-20
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-11-14
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码