A Comparison of Two Temporary Short-Circuiting Busbar Schemes for Aluminum Electrolysis
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

TF821

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    This article compared two temporary short-circuiting busbar schemes: busbar along the passage and across each cell section. Along the passage temporary short-circuiting busbars are suitable for new plants, and enables section-by-section start-up/shut-down; across-section busbars are suitable for operating plants, particularly adaptable to cases where the cells to be shutdown are located in the middle of a section; both schemes can be installed alone, and together as well. Both schemes also show good economic performance, with a short payback period. In particular, the along-the-passage scheme provides considerable benefits. Both schemes are also quite safe and highly operable, and reliable in their technology. Apart from sound economic performance, the across-sections scheme helps save electricity and mitigate the plant’s power press, and has limited impact on the existing production system.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

李广彬. 铝电解系列两种临时短路母线方案的对比分析[J]. 有色冶金节能,2022,38(4):37-40.

Copy
Related Videos

Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:March 02,2022
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online: November 19,2025
  • Published:
Article QR Code