铝电解槽焙烧启动技术对比
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.中铝郑州有色金属研究院有限公司, 河南 郑州 450041 ; 2.包头铝业有限公司, 内蒙古 包头 014000

作者简介:

马军义(1972—),男,河南禹州人,工程师,硕士,主要从事有色合金冶炼与熔铸工作。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TF821

基金项目:


Comparison of Roasting Start-up Technologies for Aluminum Electrolytic Cells
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    本文介绍了燃气焙烧启动技术的过程控制,从焙烧效果及经济性等方面对比焦粒焙烧技术和燃气焙烧技术。对比结果显示,焦粒焙烧电解槽的总体上抬量小于燃气焙烧电解槽的上抬量;焦粒焙烧电解槽前期升温速度偏快,可控程度相对稍差,燃气焙烧升温速度稍慢,升温均恒,便于控制;两种焙烧方法的电解槽的阴极钢棒温度、炉底板温度和熔体区槽壳温度没有显差别;在经济性和环保方面,单台电解槽燃气焙烧较焦粒焙烧节省约1.3万元,能源利用率高,有利降碳减排,启动后无需打捞炭渣。

    Abstract:

    This article introduced the process control of the gas roasting start-up technology, and compared the coke roasting technology and the gas roasting technology from the aspects of roasting effect and cost-effectiveness. The comparison results show that the overall uplift of the coke roasting electrolytic cell is smaller than that of the gas roasting electrolytic cell; the initial heat-up rate of coke roasting electrolytic cell is somewhat faster with a bit poorer controlability relatively while the heat-up rate of gas roasting electrolytic cell is slightly slower with a constant temperature rise, allowing for easy control; there is no obvious differentce in cathode steel bar temperature, furnace bottom plate temperature and melt zone shell temperature between the two roasting methods; in terms of cost-effectiveness and environmental protection, gas roasting of a single electrolytic cell saves about 13,000 yuan compared with coke roasting, with which the energy utilization rate is higher, being conducive to carbon reduction and emission abatement, and there is no need to salvage the carbon residue after startup.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

马军义,王俊伟,赵伟,等.铝电解槽焙烧启动技术对比[J].有色冶金节能,2022,38(1):52-55.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-29
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-11-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码